Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26 Karnataka23 Mumbai22 Jaipur21 Ahmedabad20 Hyderabad19 Surat18 Pune10 Amritsar10 Chandigarh7 Rajkot4 Lucknow4 Indore4 Visakhapatnam3 Bangalore2 Guwahati2 Patna1 Nagpur1 SC1 Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 2503 Section 693 Section 234A3 Section 115B2 Addition to Income2 Natural Justice2

TEJU KIRAN HOLE NARSIPURA MURTHY,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian .S, JCIT-DR

Section 115A(5)Section 115BSection 144C(1)Section 144C(15)(b)Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69

68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D of the Act. E. CONSEQUENTIAL GROUNDS: 15. The CIT(A) and Ld AO erred in charging interest under section 234A and 234B of the Act. 16. The CIT(A) and Ld AO erred in initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c), 271(1)(b) and 271F

M/S. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the captioned appeals of the assessee is allowed for 10

ITA 1265/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Roti, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR

Section 234ASection 250Section 37(1)

271F of the Act 8.1. The learned CIT(Appeals) has erred in and upholding Assessing Officer's action in initiating penalty proceedings under section 271 B and 271 F of the Act without appreciating the fact that the Appellant had filed return of income and tax audit report for AY 2014-15 within the extended due date of November