Search: section 68

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur39 Mumbai26 Delhi26 Karnataka21 Chennai21 Hyderabad16 Ahmedabad15 Indore12 Pune11 Kolkata9 Agra8 Surat7 Bangalore6 Rajkot4 Ranchi3 Jabalpur2 Nagpur2 Cuttack2 Visakhapatnam1 Cochin1 Amritsar1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 271D22 Section 269S9 Section 271E8 Section 269T6 Penalty6 Section 2694 Section 271D(2)4 Addition to Income4 Section 2633 Section 143(3)

KARNATAKA AGROCHEMICAL PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-4(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 98/BANG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri SreeHariKutsa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 250Section 269TSection 271E

271E on the facts and circumstances of the case. 25. On the other hand, the ld. DR submitted that the assessee has received the impugned loans in cash and repaid them in cash. The assessee has not given any specific reason or cause leading to commercial expediency of the transactions in cash. The credit balance of the concerned director

KARNATAKA AGROCHEMICAL PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-4(1), BANGALORE

SRI.YARABOLU SESHADRI REDDY,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE

KARNATAKA AGROCHEMICAL PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-4(1), BANGALORE

SRI.YARABOLU SESHADRI REDDY,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE

AKASH EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT TRUST,BENGALURU vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-2, BANGALORE

JICE ACADEMY FOR EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI

SHRI MANOJ BHAWARLAL DHOOT ,BAGALKOT vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIJAPURA RANGE , VIJAPURA

MFAR HOLDINGS PVT. LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. PR. CIT, BANGALORE