Search: section 68

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai56 Jaipur32 Mumbai27 Karnataka21 Kolkata12 Ahmedabad9 Hyderabad7 Delhi6 Bangalore6 Indore4 Pune3 Varanasi2 Chandigarh2 Rajkot2 SC2 Jodhpur1 Calcutta1 Nagpur1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 14A45 Section 143(3)9 Addition to Income6 Section 2505 Section 1325 Disallowance5 Section 683 Section 234B2

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/BANG/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Dec 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Rishabh Singhvi

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

271A, Section 271AA. Section 271BA. Section 271G and Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 12. Without prejudice. the learned AO also erred in initiating penalty proceedings under both section 271AA and section 271G of the Act without appreciating the varying scope of operation of these provisions. 13. The Appellant craves leave

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

M/S M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSORE

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU

M/S. M K AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SRIRANGAPATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSORE

SOMASHEKHAR VIRUPAX UMARAMI L/H SMT. LATHARANI . S UMARANI ,HUBBALLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), HUBLI