BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 234Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24Mumbai8Bangalore3Ahmedabad2Jaipur2Kolkata1Lucknow1Delhi1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)4Section 234A4Section 143(1)4Section 92Section 80A2Section 1472Section 801A2House Property2Deduction2Addition to Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT) , CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU , BENGALURU vs. TATA COMMUNICATIONS (UK) LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the CO of the assesseeare dismissed

ITA 39/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubeyit(It)A No.39/Bang/2025 Assessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri. Ketan Ved, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 115A(1)(b)Section 147Section 148ASection 234ASection 9Section 9(1)(vi)

68 Upper Thames Street, Bangalore. London EC4V3BJ, United Kingdom 999999. PAN :AAHCT 0782 C APPELLANT RESPONDENT CONo.8/Bang/2025 (in ITA No.39/Bang/2025) Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s. Tata Communications (UK) Ltd., Vs. DCIT (International United Kingdom 999999. Taxation), PAN :AAHCT 0782 C Circle –2(2), Bangalore. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Ketan Ved, CA Revenue by : Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT

2

ARATHI VINAY PATIL ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(4), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 604/BANG/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 44ASection 80Section 801ASection 80I

234F of the Act be deleted and the refund as claimed in the return of income be allowed along with the Interest. 2.17 NFAC not agreeing with the contention of the assessee, dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Against this assessee is once again in appeal before us. Arathi Vinay Patil, Bangalore Page 7 of 14 3. We have heard

THE NARAGUND TALUKA PRATHAMIKA SHIKSAK SHIKSAKIYAR CO OP CREDIT S LIMITED ,NARGUND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GADAG

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1288/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Siddesh .N. Gaddi, CA
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 63Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(1)(a)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(i)Section 9

68,586/-. The assessee challenged the said order before the Ld.CIT(A) and contended that the interest income are infact attributable to the banking business of the assessee and the other income of rent received is also related to the income from house property owned by the assessee and therefore the disallowance made by the AO is not correct