MR. SANDEEP SAMANTHA,MANGALURU vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 1235/BANG/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Sept 2020AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri George George Kassessment Year : 2016-17 Shri. Sandeep Samantha, Vs. The Additional Commissioner Of D.No.2-1-7/7, Shop No.2, Income-Tax, Manasa Residency, Chilimbi, Urwa, Cpc- Tds, Mangaluru – 575 006. Ghaziabad. Pan : Axlps 5874 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Srinivas Kamath, Ca Revenue By : Dr. Shankar Prasad, Add. Cit (Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 17.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2020 O R D E R Per A. K. Garodia: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee & The Same Is Directed Against The Order Of Learned Cit(A), Mangaluru Dated 16.01.2019 For Assessment Year 2016-17 In Respect Of Filing Of Form No.26Q For Quarter No.1 Of The Financial Year 2015-16. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under:
For Appellant: Shri. Srinivas Kamath, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Shankar Prasad, Add. CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 194ISection 200Section 200(3)Section 234ESection 3
68 ITD 390 (Mumbai).
The object of introducing section 234E to curb a situation where tax was used to be deducted