BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai83Delhi66Kolkata18Ahmedabad11Jaipur10Pune6Chennai5Bangalore4Rajkot3Nagpur2Surat1Guwahati1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 115J15Section 153A9Depreciation4Section 1323Section 2343Section 139(1)3Section 1433Section 133A3Section 1483Addition to Income

M/S.BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE

ITA 1999/BANG/2016[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jun 2022AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dilip, Standing Counsel for the Dept
Section 115JSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143Section 148Section 153ASection 234

68,196/-. The assessee has claimed an amount of Rs.2,99,00,000/- as depreciation on windmill @ 100% of the cost of windmill. In the order of assessment, the AO has restricted the claim for depreciation on windmill to 1/15th of its cost i.e, Rs.19,19,333/-and recomputed the ‘book profits’ u/s 115JB of the Act at Rs.2

3
Survey u/s 133A3

M/S.BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE

ITA 2002/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dilip, Standing Counsel for the Dept
Section 115JSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143Section 148Section 153ASection 234

68,196/-. The assessee has claimed an amount of Rs.2,99,00,000/- as depreciation on windmill @ 100% of the cost of windmill. In the order of assessment, the AO has restricted the claim for depreciation on windmill to 1/15th of its cost i.e, Rs.19,19,333/-and recomputed the ‘book profits’ u/s 115JB of the Act at Rs.2

M/S.BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE

ITA 2003/BANG/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dilip, Standing Counsel for the Dept
Section 115JSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143Section 148Section 153ASection 234

68,196/-. The assessee has claimed an amount of Rs.2,99,00,000/- as depreciation on windmill @ 100% of the cost of windmill. In the order of assessment, the AO has restricted the claim for depreciation on windmill to 1/15th of its cost i.e, Rs.19,19,333/-and recomputed the ‘book profits’ u/s 115JB of the Act at Rs.2

DCIT, UDUPI vs. M/S MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MANIPAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 658/BANG/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2015AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Sajjan Kumar Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Farhat Hussain Qureshi, CIT-II
Section 268A

68, the Calcutta High Court, while construing the expression "expenditure incurred" in s. 44A of the Act, observed : "depreciation claimed shall include the expenditure incurred." 16. There are only two recognised methods of accounting : (i) cash basis, and (ii) merecantile basis. Under the cash basis only cash transactions are recorded. It is only cash receipts and cash payments which find