BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai31Delhi29Raipur17Jaipur15Pune8Guwahati8Hyderabad7Cochin6Chennai5Kolkata5Bangalore5Panaji5Indore3Surat2Visakhapatnam1Cuttack1Karnataka1Lucknow1Patna1Rajkot1Ranchi1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 54F8Section 153C6Section 53A4Capital Gains4Addition to Income3Section 22Section 452Section 234A2Section 143(3)

M/S AGNUS HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 410/BANG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Sept 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.S. Shasidhar, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment, held as under:- 1. The assessee has derived a short term capital gain by entering into a JDA on 15 3 2006 itself. 2. Since the cost of construction as per M/s Plama Developers Pvt. Ltd. is Rs 1600/per square feet (the cost for completion of the project which lasted about 4 years time from the date Page

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(3), BANGALORE vs. M/S. R. MUNIRAJU (HUF), BANGALORE

2
Section 1482
Long Term Capital Gains2
Exemption2

In the result, the appeal by the revenue and the CO by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 54/BANG/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 153C

u/s. 153C of the Act is upheld and order of the CIT(Appeals) is reversed on this issue.” 18. The provisions of section 153C(1) reads as follows – “153C. (1)Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery

SMT. A.P. LAKSHMI GOWRI,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 957/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Ranjan, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Ujjwal Kumar, JCIT DR
Section 2Section 234ASection 45Section 53ASection 54F

reassessment proceedings pursuant to which order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 1st October 2014 were passed. making an addition of Rs 2,03,53,228 for each of the Appellants as income from capital gains. thereby determining total income at Rs 2,03,53,230 & Rs 2,06,22,148. Aggrieved with the order

SRI. A.R. PRASAD,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 956/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Ranjan, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Ujjwal Kumar, JCIT DR
Section 2Section 234ASection 45Section 53ASection 54F

reassessment proceedings pursuant to which order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 1st October 2014 were passed. making an addition of Rs 2,03,53,228 for each of the Appellants as income from capital gains. thereby determining total income at Rs 2,03,53,230 & Rs 2,06,22,148. Aggrieved with the order

ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. SHRI. M.R. ANANDARAM (HUF), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and the Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1169/BANG/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 May 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri A.K. Garodia

For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-III(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(14)

147 of the IT Act respectively. In the Wealth Tax assessment order (a copy of the same has been filed by the appellant), the Assessing Officer has taken a stand that these lands are owned and possessed by the appellant and are exigible to wealth tax in its hands. The AO has also assessed the Wealth arising