BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi14Raipur6Mumbai6Pune5Ahmedabad3Jaipur3Lucknow3Bangalore3Chennai2Amritsar2Indore1Agra1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 1487Section 1474Section 1444Section 50C4Section 148A4Section 144C3Section 693Section 1422TDS

VAZHOOR SUDARSANAN THAMPI,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), WARD-2(1), BENGALURU

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 893/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan Ka. Y. 2015-16 Appellant Respondent Vazhoor Sudarshanan The Income Tax Officer Thampi International Taxation Vazhoor House, Ward 2 (1) T C 5/1892Valappad Bangalore Vallapad Beach Thrissur Kerala 680567 Pan Afxpt6193D For Appellant Shri Sidhesh N Gadi, Ca For Respondent Dr. Divya K J Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19-08-2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28-08-2025

Section 142Section 143Section 144Section 144CSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69

reassessment proceedings are for the benefit of the revenue and not for the benefit of the assessee and as there Page 5 of 14 is no claim by filing an original return of income, such claim of refund cannot be granted. 7. In response to the above remand report the assessee was directed to furnish the rejoinder. In rejoinder assessee

2
Addition to Income2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL TAXN) CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S COFFEEDAY ENTERPRISES LIMITED , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross Objection of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2931/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Muzzaffar Hussain, CIT (D.R)
Section 195

55A shall be deleted.” (iii) Letter dated 17.01.2018 from M/s. Arduino Holdings Ltd. stating that the interest is waived. C.O. No. 42/Bang/2019 (iv) Letter dated 25.06.2018 filed by Shri V.G. Siddhartha before DCIT, Central Circle, with respect to the declaration on statement recorded during the course of search and seizure. 7.4 The Ld. DR submitted that the above mentioned details

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU vs. HIREHAL JAIRAJ BALRAM, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 1961/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: FixedITAT Bangalore18 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)Section 50C

u/s 50C of the Income Tax Act\n1961 had resulted in subjecting a “hypothetical income”\nto tax which is not permissible under law and which\nmandates at only the “real income” can be subjected to\ntaxation under the Income Tax Act 1961.\n4.2.3 In support of our above submission the appellant rely upon\nthe following decisions and the ratios