Search: reassessment u/s 147 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 282Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai16 Raipur13 Chandigarh7 Rajkot3 Bangalore3 Hyderabad3 Delhi3 Jodhpur1 Indore1 Jaipur1 Amritsar1 Nagpur1 Panaji1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 1487 Section 69A4 Section 1474 Section 2503 Section 144C3 Section 1512 Section 1442 Cash Deposit2 Addition to Income

AKSHAY KUMAR RUNGTA,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per above terms

ITA 66/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubeyit(It)A No.66/Bang/2024 Assessment Year :2015-16

For Appellant: Shri. Ravishankar S. V, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 147Section 147rSection 148Section 151Section 153Section 153CSection 250

2

Natural Justice2

147 r.w.s144C of the Act and ought to have passed the order under section 153C of the Act. ii. Failure to Dispose Objections: The order of reassessment is further bad in law as the learned assessing officer failed to IT(IT)A No.66/Bang/2024 Page 3 of 31 dispose the legal objections raised by the appellant dated 10.11.2021 on the facts

SHWETA GADAY,BIDAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , BIDAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2314/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Subramanya Bhat, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian .S, JCIT-DR

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

147 of the Act. The assessee filed her Page 4 of 9 response to the remand report and submitted that the reasons recorded for issuing the notice u/s. 148 may be furnished. Further, the assessee filed a response on 10/02/2022. The assessee during remand proceedings had filed various documents to show that they are earning income out of the cattle

CHANDRAKALA NARALA,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2575/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri. Pranit Tanna, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 249(4)(b)Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 282ASection 69A

147 read with section 144 for the Assessment Year 2016-17. Based upon the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessment Unit has erred in considering the cash deposits of Rs. 68,22,000 as unexplained income u/s 69A of the Act Page 2 of 5 2. The learned Assessing Officer has erred in levying interest under section 234B