Search: reassessment u/s 147

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai24 Chennai21 Cochin19 Jaipur18 Ahmedabad8 Kolkata7 Pune6 Hyderabad5 Rajkot4 Delhi3 Chandigarh3 Visakhapatnam3 Bangalore3 Raipur3 Nagpur2 Indore2 Guwahati2 Patna1 SC1 Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 14818 Section 271A4 Section 271B4 Section 2713 Section 44A3 Penalty3 Reassessment2 Reopening of Assessment2 Addition to Income

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/BANG/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Ms. Vanaja, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms. Renuka Devi, Jt. CIT(DR)

Section 148Section 271A

271B B for the AY 2006-07. 2. First the appeals in ITA Nos. 4 & 8/Bang/2015 arising against the reassessment order are taken up. The assessee has raised various grounds in these appeals, however, at the time of hearing, the assessee has also filed an additional ground, which reads as under:- ITA Nos.4 to 6 & 8/Bang/2015 Page

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

HARSHAVARDHAN ,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE