Search: reassessment u/s 147

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi52 Mumbai15 Chennai12 Indore4 Bangalore3 Pune3 Nagpur2 Varanasi2 Raipur2 Kolkata1 Amritsar1 Jaipur1 Ahmedabad1 SC1 Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153C12 Section 143(3)9 Section 139(1)6 Section 1326 Section 133A3 Section 693 Section 115B3 Section 153A3 Unexplained Investment

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 539/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

u/s. 153C and as per the above provisions of section 140A, therefore he is not required to pay entire tax before filing return of income. 16. Further, section 139(9) of the Act is as under:- “139(9) Where the Assessing Officer considers that the return of income furnished by the assessee is defective, he may intimate the defect

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU