BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 801A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Hyderabad41Delhi31Indore15Chennai14Kolkata9Ahmedabad8Surat8Rajkot7Patna6Jodhpur5Jaipur4Lucknow3Bangalore3Nagpur2Chandigarh2Raipur1Pune1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 1477Section 36(1)(viia)4Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Deduction2Reassessment2

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (LTU),, BENGALURU vs. M/S. VIJAYA BANK, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed while the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1832/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jan 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri. S.Ananthan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT (DR) (ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 36(1)(viia)

7. The AO however held that the Assessee did not file population and location of rural branches in the course of original assessment proceedings. The places where the rural branches were located at a population exceeding 10,000 and that the bank had failed to disclose the necessary details. The AO also held that though the census data was available

M/S JINDAL ALUMINIUM LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 919/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P. Boazassessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri S. Parthasarathi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Harinder Kumar, CIT(A)-3
Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 80

801A. 4. It has now been noticed that certain income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment due to assessee's failure to disclose Page 7 of 19 fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment for A Y 2005-06. The details are as under: 5. During the FY 2004-05, an area of 694 sq. meters

GMR TAMBARAM TINDIVANAM EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result that the revenue appeals are dismissed

ITA 545/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Sunil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 16

801A is to be allowed during current year if, allowed in earlier assessment years. In other words, principle of consistency needs to be followed. Reliance is placed on Bangalore ITAT decision in ITA No 1132 & 1133/Bang/2018. 11. The strengthening of the existing four lanes is required to be treated as a development of infrastructure activity in terms of various terms