DR. SANJAY R MAGAVI ,HAVERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HAVERI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

reassessment was completed u/s.147 and income was assessed at Rs.1,20,74,216 including the income assessed u/s.143(3) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved from the above order of the A.O., the assessee has filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) issued various notices to the assessee on different dates, however, the assessee has not responded

KEMPAIAH NAGARAJ,BANGALORE vs. NA, NA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2016-17

Section 151A and Faceless Reassessment Scheme 6. Without prejudice, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) also erred in not considering the detailed responses and evidences filed before the Assessing Officer, justifying the claim of indexed costs of acquisition and improvement and exemption u/s. 54F

MUNIRAJU VIJAYALAKSHMI ,CHIKKABALLAPURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHIKKABALLAPURA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

54F of\nthe Act on the facts and circumstances of the case.\n9. The appellant denies the liability to pay interest u/s.234A and 234B of\nthe Act. The interest levied being erroneous is liable to be deleted on the facts\nand circumstances of the case.\n10. The appellant craves for leave of this Hon'ble Tribunal, to add, alter,\ndelete