BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Pune6Bangalore3Delhi3Kolkata3Surat1Nagpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 54F8Section 53A4Section 54E3Capital Gains3Long Term Capital Gains3Exemption3Section 22Section 452Section 234A2Natural Justice

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), BANGALORE vs. SRI TNN SHETTY(HUF), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1129/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jul 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Vishnu Bharath, CA
Section 148Section 54E

reassessment proceedings, the question whether the assessee should be allowed exemption u/s. 54EC of the Act came up for consideration before the AO. According to the AO, the sale proceeds of Page 3 of 10 the property from the HUF were credited in the partner’s capital account in M/s. Tallam Textiles and HUF obtained a loan from the firm

SMT. A.P. LAKSHMI GOWRI,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

2
ITA 957/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Ranjan, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Ujjwal Kumar, JCIT DR
Section 2Section 234ASection 45Section 53ASection 54F

reassessment proceedings pursuant to which order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 1st October 2014 were passed. making an addition of Rs 2,03,53,228 for each of the Appellants as income from capital gains. thereby determining total income at Rs 2,03,53,230 & Rs 2,06,22,148. Aggrieved with the order

SRI. A.R. PRASAD,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 956/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Ranjan, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Ujjwal Kumar, JCIT DR
Section 2Section 234ASection 45Section 53ASection 54F

reassessment proceedings pursuant to which order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 1st October 2014 were passed. making an addition of Rs 2,03,53,228 for each of the Appellants as income from capital gains. thereby determining total income at Rs 2,03,53,230 & Rs 2,06,22,148. Aggrieved with the order