BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

211 results for “reassessment”+ Section 49(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai827Delhi698Chennai242Jaipur230Ahmedabad219Bangalore211Hyderabad178Chandigarh147Kolkata120Raipur99Pune84Amritsar82Indore68Nagpur51Rajkot45Guwahati40Visakhapatnam32Surat26Cochin25Patna22Allahabad22Lucknow21Jodhpur19Cuttack19Dehradun10Jabalpur8Agra8Ranchi7Panaji2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14882Addition to Income77Section 143(3)73Section 153A61Section 14760Section 153C58Section 13241Section 133A37Disallowance35Section 14A

NEETA BHAMBHANI,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, (IT), CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU

In the result, I pass the following:-

ITA 3124/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Adv. Ema Bindu, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Divya K.J., CIT D.R
Section 10(4)(ii)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 69

49. The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of whether the time limit prescribed under section 149(1)(b) of the old regime continues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly, a notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of six years from

Showing 1–20 of 211 · Page 1 of 11

...
28
Reassessment18
Reopening of Assessment17

ARUN DURAISWAMY,MYSORE, KARNATAKA vs. ITO, INTL. TAXATION WARD 1(1), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 193/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: CA Deepak Gunashekar, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Divya K.J, CIT D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 69Section 69C

49. The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of whether the time limit prescribed under section 149(1)(b) of the old regime continues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly, a notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of six years from

IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 497/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings IBM Deutschland 501/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- GMBH ("IBM 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 Germany") proceedings 489/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- IBM Canada Limited 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 proceedings BM Osterreich 504/Bang/2024 During re- Internationale assessment 2012- Buromaschinen 271(1)(c) Not filed proceedings 13 Gesellschaft m.b.H ("IBM Austria") 502/Bang/2024 During

IBM CORPORATION,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 544/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings IBM Deutschland 501/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- GMBH ("IBM 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 Germany") proceedings 489/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- IBM Canada Limited 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 proceedings BM Osterreich 504/Bang/2024 During re- Internationale assessment 2012- Buromaschinen 271(1)(c) Not filed proceedings 13 Gesellschaft m.b.H ("IBM Austria") 502/Bang/2024 During

IBM ISRAEL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 496/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings IBM Deutschland 501/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- GMBH ("IBM 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 Germany") proceedings 489/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- IBM Canada Limited 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 proceedings BM Osterreich 504/Bang/2024 During re- Internationale assessment 2012- Buromaschinen 271(1)(c) Not filed proceedings 13 Gesellschaft m.b.H ("IBM Austria") 502/Bang/2024 During

IBM CORPORATION,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 499/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings IBM Deutschland 501/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- GMBH ("IBM 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 Germany") proceedings 489/Bang/2024 During re- 2012- IBM Canada Limited 271(1)(c) Not filed assessment 13 proceedings BM Osterreich 504/Bang/2024 During re- Internationale assessment 2012- Buromaschinen 271(1)(c) Not filed proceedings 13 Gesellschaft m.b.H ("IBM Austria") 502/Bang/2024 During

IBM ISRAEL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 495/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2014-15

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nBuromaschinen\n13\nassessment\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nproceedings\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012

SAIKAT CHINMAY BHATTACHARYA,MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 1(1), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 582/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
Section 147Section 148Section 69

49. The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of\nwhether the time limit prescribed under section 149(1)(b) of the old regime\ncontinues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly,\na notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of\nsix years from

RAGHAVAN NAMBATH MENON,BENGALURU vs. ITO, WARD INTL. TAXATION 1(2), BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU

In the result, I pass the following:-

ITA 278/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: CA Suresh Muthukrishnan, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Divya K.J., CIT D.R
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 149(1)(b)Section 68

49. The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of whether the time limit prescribed under section 149(1)(b) of the old regime continues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly, a notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of six years from

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 543/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2017-18

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nBuromaschinen\n13\nassessment\nGesellschaft m.b.H\nproceedings\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 489/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2012-13

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nassessment\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nassessment\n13\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\nBuromaschinen\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nassessment\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n13\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nproceedings\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012

COMPAGNIE IBM FRANCE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 546/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2015-16

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\nBuromaschinen\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\n2012-\n13\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nassessment\nproceedings\n2012-\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n271(1

IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 501/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2012-13

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nInternationale\n13\nassessment\nBuromaschinen\nproceedings\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\n\nIBM Del Peru

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

reassessment proceedings were initiated. Thus, the Revenue has accepted the allowability of depreciation on identical assets created based on identical business transfer agreement in earlier years. In the absence of any change in facts or law, the Revenue cannot take a contradictory stand in the year under consideration. The settled principle that the Revenue cannot blow hot and cold

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 292/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

reassessment proceedings were initiated. Thus, the Revenue has accepted the allowability of depreciation on identical assets created based on identical business transfer agreement in earlier years. In the absence of any change in facts or law, the Revenue cannot take a contradictory stand in the year under consideration. The settled principle that the Revenue cannot blow hot and cold

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 290/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

reassessment proceedings were initiated. Thus, the Revenue has accepted the allowability of depreciation on identical assets created based on identical business transfer agreement in earlier years. In the absence of any change in facts or law, the Revenue cannot take a contradictory stand in the year under consideration. The settled principle that the Revenue cannot blow hot and cold

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 490/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2013-14

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nBuromaschinen\n13\nassessment\nGesellschaft m.b.H\nproceedings\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012

IBM CHINA HONG KONG LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 500/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2014-15

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nInternationale\n13\nassessment\nBuromaschinen\nproceedings\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012-\n271(1

IBM JAPAN LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 492/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2013-14

reassessment proceedings\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\n13\nassessment\nGermany\")\nproceedings\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\nBM Osterreich\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nInternationale\n13\nassessment\nBuromaschinen\nproceedings\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\nIBM Del Peru SAC\n2012-\n271(1

IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 542/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2024AY 2014-15

reassessment proceedings\n\nIBM Deutschland\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n501/Bang/2024\nDuring re-\nGMBH (\"IBM\nGermany\")\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\n\nIBM Canada Limited\n2012-\n271(1)(c)\n489/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\n13\nassessment\nproceedings\n\nBM Osterreich\nInternationale\nBuromaschinen\nGesellschaft m.b.H\n(\"IBM Austria\")\n2012-\n13\n271(1)(c)\n504/Bang/2024\nNot filed\nDuring re-\nassessment\nproceedings\n\nIBM Del Peru