2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 43Cclear
Sorted by relevance
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: Na
reassessment was not valid.” 216. The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v. Eastern Commercial Enterprises, 210 ITR 103 (Cal) held as follows:- “8. We have considered the contesting contentions of the parties. It is true that Shri Sukla has proved to be a shifty person as a witness. At the earlier stages, he claimed