APPU NUTRITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHEMMANUR HALL,BANGALORE vs. DCIT-CIRCLE 1(1)(1),BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING,KORAMANGALA

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Prakash Chand Yadavassessment Year : 2015-16 Appu Nutritious Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, C/O, Idiom Design & Circle – 1(1)(1), Consulting Ltd., Joseph Bangalore. Chemmanur Hall, 1St Cross, 1St Stage, Indiranagar, Bangalore – 560 038. Pan : Aabca 7049 M Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Ajith Kumar, Director Respondent By : Ms. Neha Sahay, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bangalore. Date Of Hearing : 12.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.11.2024 O R D E R Per Laxmi Prasad Sahuthis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 12.07.2024 Of The Cit(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Nfac], For The Ay 2015-16. 2. Briefly Stated The Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 29.09.2015 Declaring ‘Nil’ Income. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & Notice Was Issued To The Assessee. During The Page 2 Of 5

sections 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act and the assessment proceedings were completed. 3. Aggrieved from the Order of Assessment, assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) on 12.06.2018. During the appellate proceedings, the CIT(A) issued 8 notices to the assessee but there was no response from the assessee side. Accordingly, he dismissed the appeal