BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 35Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi42Mumbai40Raipur19Chennai8Hyderabad7Kolkata7Bangalore6Ahmedabad5Chandigarh4Jaipur2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)15Section 14815Section 234B10Section 35D7Reassessment6Addition to Income6Section 2635Section 234D5Section 1475Depreciation

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S AVASARALA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 815/BANG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Aug 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan & Shri. Abraham P. Georgei.T.A No.815/Bang/2014 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -11(1), Bangalore .. Appellant V. Avasarala Technologies Ltd., No.47, 36Th Main, Brm Ist Stage, Dollars Scheme, Bangalore – 560 068 .. Respondent Pan : Aabca 2381E Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri. L. V. Bhaskar Reddy, Jcit Heard On : 26.08.2015 Pronounced On : 31.08.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri. L. V. Bhaskar Reddy, JCIT
Section 35D

section 35D disallowed the claim and the ITA.815/Bang/2014 Page - 2 assessee also admitted the same during the reassessment proceedings.” 02. When

SHREE GAVI SIDDESHWARA MINERALS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

5
Reopening of Assessment5
Disallowance5
ITA 511/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Bangalore
20 Sept 2019
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234DSection 263

reassessment order passed is invalid and without jurisdiction as he had no jurisdiction to assess any other income. 11. The authorities below erred in disallowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,47,00,256/-. 12. The appellant denies the liabilities of interest u/s 234B & 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest if any should be levied only on returned income

M/S SHREE GAVI SIDDESHWARA MINERALS ,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONE OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , BANGALORE

ITA 863/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234DSection 263

reassessment order passed is invalid and without jurisdiction as he had no jurisdiction to assess any other income. 11. The authorities below erred in disallowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,47,00,256/-. 12. The appellant denies the liabilities of interest u/s 234B & 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest if any should be levied only on returned income

SHREE GAVI SIDDESHWARA MINERALS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

ITA 514/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234DSection 263

reassessment order passed is invalid and without jurisdiction as he had no jurisdiction to assess any other income. 11. The authorities below erred in disallowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,47,00,256/-. 12. The appellant denies the liabilities of interest u/s 234B & 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest if any should be levied only on returned income

SHREE GAVI SIDDESHWARA MINERALS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

ITA 513/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234DSection 263

reassessment order passed is invalid and without jurisdiction as he had no jurisdiction to assess any other income. 11. The authorities below erred in disallowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,47,00,256/-. 12. The appellant denies the liabilities of interest u/s 234B & 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest if any should be levied only on returned income

SHREE GAVI SIDDESHWARA MINERALS ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

ITA 512/BANG/2019[202-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234DSection 263

reassessment order passed is invalid and without jurisdiction as he had no jurisdiction to assess any other income. 11. The authorities below erred in disallowing depreciation amounting to Rs.2,47,00,256/-. 12. The appellant denies the liabilities of interest u/s 234B & 234C of the Act. Further prays that the interest if any should be levied only on returned income