Search: reassessment

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai39 Delhi24 Hyderabad22 Rajkot21 Jaipur17 Ahmedabad16 Pune15 Surat13 Amritsar13 Nagpur9 Bangalore6 Patna6 Raipur5 Indore5 Cuttack4 Lucknow3 Chandigarh3 Jabalpur2 Karnataka2 Guwahati2 Chennai2 SC1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 14814 Section 148A9 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 271F7 Section 1476 Penalty6 Section 2744 Section 1443 Reassessment3 Section 249

M/S HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, the assessee's appeals for Assessment Years 1997-98,

ITA 891/BANG/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Nov 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha R, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Padma Meenakshi, JCIT (D.R)

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271FSection 274

reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Act, inter alia, for the six assessment years under consideration in these appeals, and notices under Section 148 were issued to the assessee on 4.7.2008 requiring it to file returns of income for these years. The assessee did not file returns of income for these assessment years in response to the notices issued

M/S HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

M/S HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

RAICHUR CITY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,RAICHUR vs. DIT, BANGALORE

GARJE RUDRAPPA JAYANNA ,MANDYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, MANDYA

GARJE RUDRAPPA JAYANNA ,MANDYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS , MANDYA

MRS. SUREKHA L/R OF LATE SHRI. DEVARAJ ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(5), BANGALORE

MS.DIVYA S RAO ,MYSORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE