BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur29Chennai22Hyderabad15Mumbai15Rajkot13Kolkata9Bangalore5Ahmedabad5Amritsar4Pune3Nagpur2Raipur2SC2Cuttack2Dehradun2Delhi2Guwahati2Indore1Agra1Jodhpur1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 14818Penalty5Section 271A4Section 271F4Section 271B4Section 2713Section 44A3Section 234A2Section 234B2Reassessment

RAICHUR CITY URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,RAICHUR vs. DIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1147/BANG/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Apr 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoshri Laliet Kumarraichur City Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Gunj Road, Raichur-584 102. . Appellant Vs. The Dy. Director Of Income-Tax Intelligence & Criminal Investigation, Bengaluru. . Respondent Appellant By : Shri B.S Sudheendra, C.A Respondent By : Shri G Kamaladar, Standing Counsel

For Appellant: Shri B.S Sudheendra, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G Kamaladar, Standing Counsel
Section 246A(1)Section 253(1)Section 271FSection 283B

271A or section 272A]; or [(b) an order passed by an Assessing Officer under clause (c) of section 158BC, in respect of search initiated under section 132 or books of account, other documents or any assets requisitioned under section 132A, after the 30th day of June, 1995, but before the 1st day of January, 1997; or] [(ba) an order passed

2
Reopening of Assessment2
Addition to Income2

WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 343/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Rotti, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal
Section 234ASection 234BSection 271(1)(c)

section 271(1)(c), 271A, 271AA and 271BA of the Act. 8. Relief 8.1. The Appellant prays that directions be given to grant all such relief arising from the preceding grounds as also all reliefs consequential thereto. 8.2. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise, any or all of the above Page

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/BANG/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Ms. Vanaja, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms. Renuka Devi, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 148Section 271A

271A & 271B B for the AY 2006-07. 2. First the appeals in ITA Nos. 4 & 8/Bang/2015 arising against the reassessment order are taken up. The assessee has raised various grounds in these appeals, however, at the time of hearing, the assessee has also filed an additional ground, which reads as under:- ITA Nos.4 to 6 & 8/Bang/2015 Page

M/S AMAN GOLD PLAZA,PUTTUR vs. ITO, PUTTUR

In the result, all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/BANG/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Ms. Vanaja, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms. Renuka Devi, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 148Section 271A

271A & 271B B for the AY 2006-07. 2. First the appeals in ITA Nos. 4 & 8/Bang/2015 arising against the reassessment order are taken up. The assessee has raised various grounds in these appeals, however, at the time of hearing, the assessee has also filed an additional ground, which reads as under:- ITA Nos.4 to 6 & 8/Bang/2015 Page

HARSHAVARDHAN ,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, all 13 appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 404/BANG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jan 2020AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 271Section 271ASection 271BSection 274Section 44A

271A is leviable, Penalty u/s 271B also cannot be levied for non-audit as prescribed u/s 44AB. Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of the lower authorities. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that the tribunal order cited by the learned of learned AR of the assessee and the Judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High