BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 206C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi52Mumbai22Chennai12Kolkata9Amritsar4Indore4Jaipur4Nagpur3Bangalore3Jodhpur3Pune3Varanasi2Raipur2SC1Uttarakhand1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 153C12Section 143(3)9Section 139(1)6Section 1326Section 133A3Section 693Section 115B3Section 153A3Unexplained Investment3

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 541/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

6 of 17 “ii. The appellant is preferring to argue the appeals on the limited ground of the return of income being defective and the recourse available to the assessing officer in processing a defective return of income. The remaining grounds of appeal may be deemed to be academic and not withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity

TDS3
Addition to Income3
Search & Seizure3

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 539/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

6 of 17 “ii. The appellant is preferring to argue the appeals on the limited ground of the return of income being defective and the recourse available to the assessing officer in processing a defective return of income. The remaining grounds of appeal may be deemed to be academic and not withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 540/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

6 of 17 “ii. The appellant is preferring to argue the appeals on the limited ground of the return of income being defective and the recourse available to the assessing officer in processing a defective return of income. The remaining grounds of appeal may be deemed to be academic and not withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity