BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

97 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi623Mumbai212Chennai99Bangalore97Jaipur93Chandigarh85Amritsar74Pune36Agra35Nagpur34Patna32Hyderabad31Raipur28Ranchi22Cochin21Dehradun20Allahabad20Cuttack16Lucknow14Visakhapatnam9Guwahati9Kolkata7Rajkot7Ahmedabad7Indore6Karnataka6Jabalpur2Orissa2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A202Addition to Income88Section 153C74Section 143(3)73Section 13263Disallowance37Section 153D29Section 40A(3)27Natural Justice25Section 147

KHODAY ESHWARSA AND SONS PVT LTD (FORMERLY MS KHODAY ESHWARSA AND SONS),BANGALORE vs. DCIT- CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1) BGL, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1080/BANG/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

reassessment in cases where search has been conducted under section 132 or requisition is made under section 132A does not provide for any approval for such assessment. 50.2 A new section 153D

KHODAY ESHWARSA AND SONS ( PRESENTLY KHODAY ESHWARSA AND SONS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DCIT - CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1) BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 97 · Page 1 of 5

24
Section 14A22
Reassessment13
ITA 1079/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed
ITAT Bangalore
20 Sept 2024
AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Shankar A, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri DK Mishra, CIT (DR)
Section 153ASection 153BSection 153D

reassessment in cases where search has been conducted under section 132 or requisition is made under section 132A does not provide for any approval for such assessment. 50.2 A new section 153D

SRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BENGALURU

ITA 940/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri M.V Prasad, CA & Shri KS Rajendra KumarFor Respondent: Shri Muthu Shankar, CIT &
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 25Section 250Section 8

reassessment\nin cases where search has been conducted under section 132 or\nrequisition is made under section 132A does not provide for any\napproval for such assessment.\n50.2 A new section 153D

SRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BANGALORE

ITA 939/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Nov 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri M.V Prasad, CA & Shri KS Rajendra KumarFor Respondent: \nShri Muthu Shankar, CIT &
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 25Section 250Section 8

reassessment\nin cases where search has been conducted under section 132 or\nrequisition is made under section 132A does not provide for any\napproval for such assessment.\n\n50.2 A new section 153D

GOPAL S. PANDITH vs. DCIT,

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1186/BANG/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Neera Malhotra, CIT (D.R)
Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 234Section 548

reassessment order, as the case may be, is required to be passed by the Assessing Officer with the prior approval of the Commissioner under sub-section (12)of section 144BA.” The plain reading of the provisions of section 153D

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 237/BANG/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. Prashanth G S, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132(1)(a)Section 132(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 292B

153D. 16. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides. Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contemplates the assessment of a person other than the person searched, provided that the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion, jewellery, books of account, or documents seized or requisitioned during the course of a search under Section

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 236/BANG/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. Prashanth G S, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132(1)(a)Section 132(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 292B

153D. 16. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides. Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contemplates the assessment of a person other than the person searched, provided that the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion, jewellery, books of account, or documents seized or requisitioned during the course of a search under Section

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 234/BANG/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. Prashanth G S, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132(1)(a)Section 132(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 292B

153D. 16. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides. Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contemplates the assessment of a person other than the person searched, provided that the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion, jewellery, books of account, or documents seized or requisitioned during the course of a search under Section

M/S MSPL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

ITA 373/BANG/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri. J. D. Mistri, Senior CounselFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153D

section 153D of the Act which reads as under: . ITA Nos.372 to 374/Bang/2011 Page 4 of 16 “…………153D. No order of assessment or reassessment

M/S MSPL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

ITA 372/BANG/2011[2006-07]Status: PendingITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri. J. D. Mistri, Senior CounselFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153D

section 153D of the Act which reads as under: . ITA Nos.372 to 374/Bang/2011 Page 4 of 16 “…………153D. No order of assessment or reassessment

M/S MSPL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

ITA 374/BANG/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri. J. D. Mistri, Senior CounselFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153D

section 153D of the Act which reads as under: . ITA Nos.372 to 374/Bang/2011 Page 4 of 16 “…………153D. No order of assessment or reassessment

M/S. SRI DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES (REGD),KOLAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed\nas infructuous

ITA 1560/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

153D of the Act.\n53.1 At the outset, we note that the issue raised by the assessee on\nmerit of the case has been decided in its favour. Accordingly, we do not\nfind any reason to adjudicate the impugned issue on hand. As such, we\nkeep the issue open. Both the Id. AR and the DR did not raise

M/S MSPL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 371/BANG/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Sept 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri J.D. Mistri, Senior Counsel &For Respondent: Shri Aseem Sharma, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 153DSection 234

section 153D. 3. For the above and any other reasons which may be adduced at the time of hearing, it is prayed that the Order of the Assessing officer be directed to set aside. 4. The Appellant craves leave to add, to alter or amend all or any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal.” 3. Since the additional grounds

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

ITA 235/BANG/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. Prashanth G S, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132(1)(a)Section 132(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 292B

153D. 16. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides. Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, contemplates the assessment of a person other than the person searched, provided that the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion, jewellery, books of account, or documents seized or requisitioned during the course of a search under Section

SMT. AAKRUTI RUIA,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2) , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2279/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT
Section 127Section 132Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 153BSection 153C

Section 153A to 153D have prevalence over the regular provisions for assessment or reassessment under Section 143 & 147/148. 9.3 Having

BMM ISPAT LIMITED,HOSPET vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 is dismissed

ITA 779/BANG/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep, C.AFor Respondent: Shri K.V.Arvind, Standing Counsel for Dept
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 234BSection 234DSection 68

reassessment of the total income in the case of the other person contemplated in the section. In view of the assessments already being reopened and pending under section 153A of the Act, the parallel proceedings under section 153C of the Act is not contemplated under the Act. vii. Without prejudice to the above contention, the jurisdictional High Court

JOHN DEVELOPERS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 845/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

Section 292B of the Act lacks merit as the plain language of the said Section makes it abundantly clear that this provision condones the invalidity which may arise merely by mistake, defect or omission in notice. The said Section reads as under: - 292-B. Return of income, etc., not to be invalid on certain grounds.—No return of income, assessment

JOHN DISTILLERIES PVT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 987/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

Section 292B of the Act lacks merit as the plain language of the said Section makes it abundantly clear that this provision condones the invalidity which may arise merely by mistake, defect or omission in notice. The said Section reads as under: - 292-B. Return of income, etc., not to be invalid on certain grounds.—No return of income, assessment

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 838/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

Section 292B of the Act lacks merit as the plain language of the said Section makes it abundantly clear that this provision condones the invalidity which may arise merely by mistake, defect or omission in notice. The said Section reads as under: - 292-B. Return of income, etc., not to be invalid on certain grounds.—No return of income, assessment

M/S. PAUL RESORTS & HOTELS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 841/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

Section 292B of the Act lacks merit as the plain language of the said Section makes it abundantly clear that this provision condones the invalidity which may arise merely by mistake, defect or omission in notice. The said Section reads as under: - 292-B. Return of income, etc., not to be invalid on certain grounds.—No return of income, assessment