SRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BENGALURU

153\ntaxmann.com 591, has held that where a prohibitory order under section\n132(3) of the Act is not revoked within one month as per the CBDT’s\ndirective, any panchanama drawn thereafter loses its legal validity and\ncannot be considered for computing limitation under section 153B of the\nAct. The relevant finding of the Tribunal in said case reads

SHRI. BANGALORE NARAYAN DAS,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-1(1), BENGALURU

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2014-15 & 2017-18 stands allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(It)A Nos. 120 & 121/Bang/2022 (Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18)

153 of the Act. It is the submission of the ld.AR that, as the e-mail is dated 06.01.2020, the order passed is belatedly though the assessment order is dated 30.12.2019. The Ld.AR submitted that, what is to be considered is when the assessment order is issued so as to beyond the control of the authority concerned. 4.2. Admittedly

SHRI. BANGALORE NARAYAN DAS,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-1(1), BENGALURU

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2014-15 & 2017-18 stands allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(It)A Nos. 120 & 121/Bang/2022 (Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18)

153 of the Act. It is the submission of the ld.AR that, as the e-mail is dated 06.01.2020, the order passed is belatedly though the assessment order is dated 30.12.2019. The Ld.AR submitted that, what is to be considered is when the assessment order is issued so as to beyond the control of the authority concerned. 4.2. Admittedly

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

3), The AO has already been enquired and assessee hs furnished reply which are palced at paper book page No. 29 to 32 on this point and he has accepted that the R & R expenditure is revenue in nature. There is trait law that in assessment proceedings once the income tax officer has taken a view the same cannot

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

3), The AO has already been enquired and assessee hs furnished reply which are palced at paper book page No. 29 to 32 on this point and he has accepted that the R & R expenditure is revenue in nature. There is trait law that in assessment proceedings once the income tax officer has taken a view the same cannot

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

3), The AO has already been enquired and assessee hs furnished reply which are palced at paper book page No. 29 to 32 on this point and he has accepted that the R & R expenditure is revenue in nature. There is trait law that in assessment proceedings once the income tax officer has taken a view the same cannot

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

3), The AO has already been enquired and assessee hs furnished reply which are palced at paper book page No. 29 to 32 on this point and he has accepted that the R & R expenditure is revenue in nature. There is trait law that in assessment proceedings once the income tax officer has taken a view the same cannot

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153-A." 4.1 It is submitted by Shri Nataraj, learned ASG that the amendment in section 153C was necessitated in view of the observation of the Delhi High Court in the case of Pepsico India Holdings (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153-A." 4.1 It is submitted by Shri Nataraj, learned ASG that the amendment in section 153C was necessitated in view of the observation of the Delhi High Court in the case of Pepsico India Holdings (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt

M/S. EAGLE TRADERS & LOGISTICS,BELLARY vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153-A." 4.1 It is submitted by Shri Nataraj, learned ASG that the amendment in section 153C was necessitated in view of the observation of the Delhi High Court in the case of Pepsico India Holdings (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt

MR. D K SHIVAKUMAR,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, we allow appeal filed by the assessee

3). If such orders is already in existence prior to the\ninitiation of search, the Assessing Officer is empowered to reopen those proceedings\nand reassess the total income taking note of the undisclosed income, if any, found\nduring the course of search. For this purpose, the restrictions imposed on the Assessing\nOfficer by way of sections 148 to 153

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(4), BANGALORE vs. MR. D K SHIVAKUMAR, BANGALORE

3). If such orders is already in existence prior to the\ninitiation of search, the Assessing Officer is empowered to reopen those proceedings\nand reassess the total income taking note of the undisclosed income, if any, found\nduring the course of search. For this purpose, the restrictions imposed on the Assessing\nOfficer by way of sections 148 to 153

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(4), BANGALORE vs. MR. D K SHIVAKUMAR, BANGALORE

In the result, we allow appeal filed by the assessee

3). If such orders is already in existence prior to the\ninitiation of search, the Assessing Officer is empowered to reopen those proceedings\nand reassess the total income taking note of the undisclosed income, if any, found\nduring the course of search. For this purpose, the restrictions imposed on the Assessing\nOfficer by way of sections 148 to 153

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(4), BANGALORE vs. MR. D K SHIVAKUMAR, BANGALORE

3). If such orders is already in existence prior to the\ninitiation of search, the Assessing Officer is empowered to reopen those proceedings\nand reassess the total income taking note of the undisclosed income, if any, found\nduring the course of search. For this purpose, the restrictions imposed on the Assessing\nOfficer by way of sections 148 to 153

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(4), BANGALORE vs. MR. D K SHIVAKUMAR, BANGALORE

In the result, we allow appeal filed by the assessee

3). If such orders is already in existence prior to the\ninitiation of search, the Assessing Officer is empowered to reopen those proceedings\nand reassess the total income taking note of the undisclosed income, if any, found\nduring the course of search. For this purpose, the restrictions imposed on the Assessing\nOfficer by way of sections 148 to 153

INCOME TAX OFFICER, W-1, VIJAYANAGAR vs. RAMACHANDRA SETTY AND SONS, HASSAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

153 has also been done away with in a case covered by Section 153A. With all the stops having been pulled out, the Assessing Officer under Section 153A has been entrusted with the duty of bringing to tax the total income of an assessee whose case is covered by Section 153A, by even making reassessments without any fetters, if need

INCOME TAX OFFICER W 1, HASSAN vs. RAMACHANDRA SETTY AND SONS, HASSAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

153 has also been done away with in a case covered by Section 153A. With all the stops having been pulled out, the Assessing Officer under Section 153A has been entrusted with the duty of bringing to tax the total income of an assessee whose case is covered by Section 153A, by even making reassessments without any fetters, if need

INCOME TAX OFFICER, W-1, HASSAN vs. RAMACHANDRA SETTY & SONS, HASSAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

153 has also been done away with in a case covered by Section 153A. With all the stops having been pulled out, the Assessing Officer under Section 153A has been entrusted with the duty of bringing to tax the total income of an assessee whose case is covered by Section 153A, by even making reassessments without any fetters, if need