IBM CORPORATION,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings − Category C: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act has been filed however, secondment related receipts were offered to tax only in the return filed under section 148

IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings − Category C: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act has been filed however, secondment related receipts were offered to tax only in the return filed under section 148

IBM ISRAEL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

reassessment proceedings − Category C: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act has been filed however, secondment related receipts were offered to tax only in the return filed under section 148

ARUN DURAISWAMY,MYSORE, KARNATAKA vs. ITO, INTL. TAXATION WARD 1(1), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubey

148 of the new regime only if three years or less have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year; (iii) the proviso to Section 149(1)(b) of the new regime stipulates that the Revenue can issue reassessment

SAIKAT CHINMAY BHATTACHARYA,MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 1(1), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

reassessment with a new regime. The first proviso to Section 149 does not\nexpressly bar the application of Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and\nAmendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. Section 3 of Taxation and Other\nLaws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 applies to\nthe entire Income-Tax Act, including Sections

IBM ISRAEL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

COMPAGNIE IBM FRANCE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\n17\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM JAPAN LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

RAGHAVAN NAMBATH MENON,BENGALURU vs. ITO, WARD INTL. TAXATION 1(2), BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU

In the result, I pass the following:-

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubey

Section 149(1)(b) of the Act had issued notice u/s 148 of the Act for the Asst. year 2015-16 on 19/04/2022, however concluded the reassessment

IBM JAPAN LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM CHINA HONG KONG LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\n17\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

IBM CANADA LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment

COMPAGNIE IBM FRANCE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

148\n17\nCategory B: 271(1)(c) case where original return under section 139(1) of the Act was\nnot filed and receipts were offered to tax during the reassessment