Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

439 results for “reassessment”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,482 Mumbai1,477 Jaipur473 Ahmedabad440 Bangalore439 Chennai344 Kolkata340 Hyderabad232 Pune222 Indore142 Rajkot134 Raipur124 Chandigarh113 Surat99 Cuttack89 Cochin72 Amritsar70 Agra64 Ranchi63 Nagpur60 Lucknow53 Patna50 Guwahati49 Dehradun43 Visakhapatnam41 Karnataka41 Allahabad29 SC24 Jodhpur22 Telangana21 Jabalpur11 Panaji11 Calcutta6 Varanasi5 Orissa4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3 Rajasthan1 J&K1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Uttarakhand1 Kerala1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14894 Addition to Income58 Section 27457 Section 271(1)(c)50 Section 133A43 Penalty43 Section 153C40 Section 143(3)40 Section 14738 Section 153A

KUMARSWAMY GANGASHARAISH KALLUR ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1391/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep Chalapathy, CAFor Respondent: Shri. E. Shridhar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore

Section 119Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 271BSection 44A

penalty under section 271B of the Act. However, during the course of reassessment proceedings, the AO has not initiated penalty

Showing 1–20 of 439 · Page 1 of 22

...

29

Survey u/s 133A21

SHRI S KRISHNA PRASAD ,BALLARI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELAGAVI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed

ITA 1172/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri B.S Balachandra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.N Siddappaji, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1)(3), BANGALORE vs. M/S VERDE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 3325/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Ramaswami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Siddappaji, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-7(1)(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S TRIAD RESORTS AND HOTELS PVT LTD , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 3324/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Ramaswami, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Siddappaji, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA,BANGALORE vs. ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1273/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Zain Khan, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. P. Renugadevi, JCIT

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

R.AJITH ,MYSORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 966/BANG/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SHRI. AJITH R,MYSORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1869/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

K.RAMASWAMY ,MYSORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 959/BANG/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

K RAMASWAMY ,MYSORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2527/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SHRI. K. RAMASWAMY,MYSORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE--2(1),, MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1868/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SHRI. AJITH R,,MYSORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1870/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SHRI. K. RAMASWAMY,,MYSORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1867/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SHRI. K. RAMASWAMY,MYSORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, MYSORE

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1866/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Tatakrishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manjeeth Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 133ASection 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

M/S TURBOTECH PRECISION ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-(7)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2252/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Arun Kumar Garodiaassessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Lokesh Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Sri Nandini Das, JCIT (DR)

Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(C)Section 274Section 36(1)(iii)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

M/S INTERGARDEN (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 887/BANG/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jun 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.K.Srihari, Addl.CIT

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 271(1)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

MR. SHIVAKUMAR MAHADEVAIAH ,MYSORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), MYSORE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 518/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari (Accountant Member), Shri Keshav Dubey (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sukesh Patil, CAFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, JCIT

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 68

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

DCIT-CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI, C.R. BUILDING , NAVANAGAR HUBLI vs. SHRI CHANDRASHEKHAR KOMMI, HUBLI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 753/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R

Section 133ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SRI. MOORSAVIRAPPA . C. BATLI,HUBLI vs. ITO, HUBLI

In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed

ITA 668/BANG/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Feb 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri S. Venkatesan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, JCIT (D.R)

Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SRI. NARASIMHA REDDY,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1013/BANG/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Abraham P George & Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri S.Parthasarathi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT(DR)

Section 132Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SMT. ROOPA SURYANARAYANA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 997/BANG/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Nov 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoita Nos. 997 To 1001/Bang/2014 (Asst. Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09) Smt. Roopa Suryanarayana, Prop. Yashasvi Packs, No.44, 4Th Cross, Ad Halli, Magadi Main Road, Bangalore-560 040. . Appellant Pan: Admpr 9875K

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Rukmini Attir, Jt. CIT(DR)

Section 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment