BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 92Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai17Delhi11Hyderabad6Kolkata5Bangalore3Pune3Chennai2Jaipur2Karnataka1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)3Transfer Pricing3Section 143(3)2Section 133(6)2Section 92C2Addition to Income2Comparables/TP2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1) BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. PALMER INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED, VIRGIN ISLANDS

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2431/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Respondent: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate
Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271CSection 274Section 275

penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act deleted by Ld.CIT(A) is correct or not. We have perused the copy of the order sheet furnished by the Ld.AR in which the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court had admitted the quantum appeals filed by the assessee challenging the orders of the Tribunal passed in ITA Nos. 2929 & 2930/Bang/2018

EIT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 210/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92D

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution or otherwise. the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or during the hearing of the appeal. 15. Relief a. The Appellant prays that the appeal may be allowed and the impugned final assessment order be set aside”. 2. Ground

HEWLETT PACKARD (INDIA) SOFTWARE OPERATION PRIVATE LIMITED,2016-17 vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.213/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92C

penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4.2 The learned AO has erred in law and on facts in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act. 2. Ground Nos.1.1 to 1.13 are general in nature, which do not require any adjudication. Ground No.1.14 is as follows:- Software Development Segment ("SWD") 1.14.The learned