NARAYANA HRUDAYALAYA LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(3)(1), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed
ITA 246/BANG/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Monish Sowkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Thamba Mahendra, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 43B
section 43B(f) of the Act was upheld. Thus, the contention of the assessee that it is a debatable issue is not acceptable. He further supported the reasons given by the AO for levy of penalty and accordingly the penalty levied of Rs.25,29,788
was confirmed. The assessee who aggrieved with that order is in appeal before