SRI P A USMAN ,SULLIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 , PUTTUR
In the result, the assessee appeal in ITA No
ITA 888/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judical Member Ita Nos.888 & 889(Bang)/2019 (Assessment Years : 2014-15) Shri P.A.Usman, D No.2-106-2, Chennavara House, Peruvaje Post, Bellare, Sullia-574 212 Pan No. Aappu4406R Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur Respondent Appellant By : Smt. Pratibha, Advocate Revenue By : Smt. R.Premi, Jcit
For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R.Premi, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A
section 44AB of the IT Act and confirmed the penalty levied u/s 271B of the IT Act, and dismissed assessee’s appeal. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal.
4. The ld. AR argued that the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the penalty without considering the submissions and the explanations filed in the course
