Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai77 Delhi20 Pune17 Indore13 Jaipur9 Nagpur9 Kolkata4 Rajkot2 Bangalore2 Chandigarh2 Chennai1 Amritsar1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 368 Section 234B4 Section 2502 Section 1432 Deduction2 Reassessment2 TDS2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), HUBBALLI vs. M/S. KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK LIMITED, DHARWAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 720/BANG/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri S Ananthan, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Susan D George, CIT (DR)

Section 143Section 234BSection 250Section 36

36(1)(vii)/36(1)(viia) of Act. The assessee raised the issue before the CIT(A) and CIT(A) has also partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. During the course of hearing, the ld.AR vehemently argued on legal issue raised by the issue as additional ground that the assessee is a cooperative society as per Regional Rural Bank

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), HUBBALLI vs. M/S. KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK LIMITED, DHARWAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), HUBBALLI vs. M/S. KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK LIMITED, DHARWAD

M/S KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEENA BANK,DHARWAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HUBBALLI