Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi60 Mumbai34 Indore23 Jaipur21 Nagpur17 Chennai13 Hyderabad9 Ahmedabad7 Pune7 Raipur4 Bangalore4 Lucknow4 Agra3 Allahabad3 Amritsar2 Jodhpur1 Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 143(3)4 Penalty4 Addition to Income3 Section 92C2 Section 92(3)2 Section 682 Transfer Pricing2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. SMT. VANKADARA PADMAVATHI, HOSPET, KARNATAKA

In the result, the appeal by the revenue and the CO by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1374/BANG/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri T. Srinivasa Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sridhar E., CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

260A of the Act which is pending. 5. The AO initiated penalty proceedings and passed penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Act observing that the assessee has filed inaccurate particulars of income and imposed penalty of Rs.3,30,00,000. On appeal, the ld. CIT(Appeals) after considering the grounds of the assessee and submissions

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. SMT. VANKADARA PADMAVATHI, HOSPET, KARNATAKA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. SMT. VANKADARA PADMAVATHI, HOSPET, KARNATAKA

ONMOBILE GLOBAL LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1)(2), BANGALORE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE vs. ONMOBILE GLOBAL LIMITED, BENGALURU

GOPALIYENGAR MADABUSHI MURALIDHAR, ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(4), BENGALURU