25 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 254(2)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2013-14
254 ITR 191 (P&H) • CIT vs Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd in 216 ITR 92 (P&H) .CIT Vs Ample Properties Ltd [2012] 20 taxmann.com 422 (Mad) 7.15. The AO in his penalty order has held that assessee has not attempted to establish his bonafides nor submitted any explanation before the AO during the penalty proceedings and thus has failed