Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi47 Mumbai22 Raipur17 Jaipur10 Ahmedabad5 Jabalpur5 Kolkata5 Pune5 Lucknow4 Indore3 Hyderabad2 Visakhapatnam2 Bangalore2 Nagpur2 Jodhpur2 Patna1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2 Section 44A2 Natural Justice2

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2846/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C(3)

u/s. 201(1A). In our considerate view, the assessee(deductor) gets exonerated from the applicability of TDS provisions on disallowance of the expenditure in question under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. This rational is based on the scheme of Section 40(a)(i)/(ia), which is aimed at ensuring that an expenditure should not be allowed

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

MRS. SABENA PRAKASH ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), BANGALORE