KASIREDDAY RANADHEER REDDY ,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 886/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Feb 2026AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K
For Appellant: Shri Shivprasad Reddy, AR &For Respondent: Shri N Balusamy, JCIT (DR)
Section 132Section 259Section 69
194
12 18,88,223
1,65,21,953
11.4 Further, even as per the seized document itself, a substantial portion represents opening balance of earlier year, which cannot be brought to tax in the present assessment year. Thus, we find that the addition has been made purely on assumptions and presumptions, without any supporting evidence. Such an addition cannot