Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai63 Delhi37 Rajkot31 Jaipur26 Surat14 Ahmedabad13 Indore13 Kolkata12 Pune12 Chennai11 Hyderabad8 Nagpur7 Visakhapatnam7 Chandigarh7 Raipur5 Lucknow5 Bangalore5 Cuttack2 Amritsar2 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 148A10 Section 271F8 Section 108 Section 1487 Section 271(1)(b)7 Section 142(1)6 Section 1476 Section 143(2)5 Penalty5 Capital Gains

BASAVESHWER DEVALAY ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL BASAVANABAGEWADI,BIJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, BIJAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1409/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Section 10Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 148ASection 271(1)(b)Section 271F

148A(d) of the Act and simultaneously notice u/s. 148 was\nissued. Thereafter the assessee field their return of income and claimed the\nentire income as exempt u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. Notices u/s. 143(2)\nas well as u/s. 142(1) were issued, but the assessee had not responded to\nthe notices because of the pressure

BASAVESHWER DEVALAY ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL BASAVANABAGEWADI,BIJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, BIJAPUR

BASAVESHWER DEVALAY ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL BASAVANABAGEWADI,BIJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, BIJAPUR

BASAVESHWER DEVALAY ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL ,BIJAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS , BIJAPUR

MRS. SUREKHA L/R OF LATE SHRI. DEVARAJ ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(5), BANGALORE

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(3), BENGALURU vs. UMA RUGMINI, BENGALURU

SRI. SHANKAR SOUHARDHA PATTINA SAHAKARI NIYAMIT ,GULBARGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1& TPS , GULBARGA