M/S. TATA ELXSI LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

housing projects or a\nship in Nava Sheva. Ownership of a ship per se will not attract Section 80-/B (6). It\nis the profits arising from the business of a ship which attracts sub-section (6). In\nother words, deduction under sub-section (6) at the specified rate has linkage to the\nprofits derived from the shipping operations. This

ARATHI VINAY PATIL ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(4), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2019-20

4. In any case, the authorities below have erred in not appreciating the fact that as the appellant is liable for audit under the provisions of Income tax Act, the applicable due date for filing the return of income is as per the explanation 2 to Arathi Vinay Patil, Bangalore Page 2 of 14 section