Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 17Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka63 Ahmedabad24 Delhi13 Mumbai12 Lucknow11 Jaipur3 Bangalore3 Indore2 Pune2 Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 12A8 Section 114 Section 104 Section 54F3 Section 2(15)2 Section 32 Section 542 Exemption2 Depreciation2 Addition to Income

BASHEER NOORULLAH KHAN,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 575/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2013-14 Shri Basheer Noorullah Khan, No. 116B, 5Th Block, Khb The Commissioner Of Colony, Koramangala, Vs. Income Tax (Appeals), Bangalore – 560 034. Bangalore. Pan: Ajxpk3037H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri B.S. Balachandran, Advocate Revenue By : Dr. P.V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 11.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2019

For Appellant: Shri B.S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 17ASection 53ASection 54Section 54F

17A of the Registration Act, 1908 and also the amendments in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and he has followed the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court rendered in the case of CIT Vs. Balbir Singh Maini as reported in [2017] 86 taxmann.com 94 (SC) and he has also considered another judgment of Hon’ble Apex

BASHEER NOORULLAH KHAN,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BANGALORE

BASHEER NOORULLAH KHAN,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BANGALORE

KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD vs. ADDL.DIT,

KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD,BANGALORE vs. DDIT, BANGALORE