GOBINDRAM CHANDRAMANI VIVEK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 1(1), BANGALORE, BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in the manner indicated in this order
ITA 656/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Sept 2024AY 2011-12
Bench: Mrs. Beena Pillai & Shri Ramit Kochar
For Appellant: Sh. Ashok A Kulkarni, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 54Section 54(2)Section 54F
5 to 7 in connection therewith. It is the contention of the ld.
counsel for the assessee that the assessee has made substantial compliance by making investment in residential property on or before the due date of filing of the return of income under section 139(4) of the Act. The assessee had made investment
