BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

86 results for “disallowance”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai403Delhi256Chennai107Bangalore86Hyderabad62Kolkata57Ahmedabad36Pune16Jaipur13Indore10Amritsar9Visakhapatnam9Surat5Rajkot4Cochin4Dehradun2Chandigarh2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Transfer Pricing64Addition to Income60Section 143(3)57Section 92C49Disallowance39Comparables/TP35Deduction31Section 4025Section 14A20Section 234B

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-7, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2532/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai for Shri K.R. VasudevanFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh K., D.R
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 14ASection 37Section 92C

disallowances / additions made in the assessment order, has challenged the same in appeal before us. 3. Ground Nos.1 to 7 are general in nature which do not require any adjudication. 4. Ground No.8 to 18 of the assessee’s appeal reads as under: IT(TP)A No.2532/Bang/2019 United Brewries Ltd., Bangalore Page 4 of 70 I. Grounds relating to payment

Showing 1–20 of 86 · Page 1 of 5

20
Section 14815
Penalty15

M/S INFOSYS LTD ,BANGALOR E vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee as well as by revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 735/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.735/Bang/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Sreenivas T. Bidari, D.R
Section 11Section 14ASection 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 80J

TP)A No.735/Bang/2018 & M/s. Infosys Limited, Bangalore Page 5 of 85 and 10% of salary cost of CFC amounting to Rs. 8,06,938, Rs. 24,38,481 and Rs. 4,70,713 respectively totaling to Rs. 37,16,131 as the expenditure relatable to exempt income and the same was disallowed voluntarily in the return of income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S INFOSYS LIMITED , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee as well as by revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 809/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.735/Bang/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Sreenivas T. Bidari, D.R
Section 11Section 14ASection 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 80J

TP)A No.735/Bang/2018 & M/s. Infosys Limited, Bangalore Page 5 of 85 and 10% of salary cost of CFC amounting to Rs. 8,06,938, Rs. 24,38,481 and Rs. 4,70,713 respectively totaling to Rs. 37,16,131 as the expenditure relatable to exempt income and the same was disallowed voluntarily in the return of income

LENOVO (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for above terms

ITA 281/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Kincha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sankar K Ganeshan, CIT (D.R)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

TP)A No.281/Bang/2021 Page 43 of 63 9.6 In regard to the disallowance of excess provision for warranty the assesse challenged before the ITAT against the final assessment order. The ld.AR reiterated the submissions made before the lower authorities and filed written synopsis and he submitted the assessee has maintained scientific method

UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE- 7, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 345/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai, A.R. a/wFor Respondent: Shri Saravanan B., DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 14ASection 250Section 92C

disallowable expenditure made by the Assessee with respect to the exempted income is not acceptable for reasons to be assigned the Assessing Authority, he cannot resort to the computation method under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.” (underlining supplied) IT(TP

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 308/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai, A.R. a/wFor Respondent: Shri Saravanan B., DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 14ASection 250Section 92C

disallowable expenditure made by the Assessee with respect to the exempted income is not acceptable for reasons to be assigned the Assessing Authority, he cannot resort to the computation method under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.” (underlining supplied) IT(TP

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LTU) , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2835/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am It(Tp)A No.2835/Bang/2017 : Asst.Year 2013-2014 M/S.Dell International Services The Additional Commissioner India Private Limited Of Income-Tax (Ltu) V. Bangalore. Divyashree Greens, Sy.Nos.12/1, 12/2A & 13/1A,Challaghatta Village,Varthur Hobli Bengaluru – 560 071. Pan : Aaach1925Q. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri.T.Suryanarayana, Advocate Respondent By : Sri.Praveen Karanth, Cit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 20.01.2023 Date Of Hearing : 13.01.2023 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm : This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Final Assessment Order Dated 30.11.2017 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C Of The I.T.Act. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2013-2014. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are As Follows: The Assessee Is A Company, Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing & Trading In Computer Systems Including Support & Maintenance Services & Leasing Of Computers. For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, The Return Of Income Was Filed On 30.11.2013 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.22,31,24,760. The Assessment Was Selected For Scrutiny & Notice U/S 143(2) Of The I.T.Act Was Issued On 2 It(Tp)A No.2835/Bang/2017. M/S.Dell International Services India Private Limited. 11.09.2014. During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, It Was Noticed That The International Transactions Entered By The Assessee With Its Associated Enterprises (Aes) Had Exceeded The Prescribed Limit, Hence, The Matter Was Referred To The Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo) To Determine The Arm’S Length Price (Alp) Of The Said Transaction. The Tpo Passed Order U/S 92Ca Of The I.T.Act On 19.10.2016. In The Said Order, The Tpo Had Proposed Following Adjustments:-

For Appellant: Sri.T.Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 40Section 92CSection 92C(3)

disallowed in the current year, the learned AO should be directed to allow the same on payment basis. The Hon'ble DRP and the learned AO erred in not relying on the judicial precedents put forth by the Appellant in this regard. 8. Short credit of TDS - Rs. 439,706,585 The learned AO has erred in not following

M/S. CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 280/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 92C

Disallowance of Rs. 21,31,88,214/- being royalty expenses by treating the same as a capital expenditure 7. Ground 57 – Levy of interest u/s.234B IT(TP)A No.280/Bang/2021 Page 4 of 115 MANUFACTURING SEGMENT 5. In the manufacturing segment, the assessee is in charge of conceptualization and designs. It procures equipment for manufacture both fixed and capital equipments

M/S. MAKINO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 712/BANG/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

disallowance u/s. 10A, the Tribunal held that the issue is no longer res integra as the same is covered by the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd., 349 ITR 98 wherein it was held that the expenses excluded from export turnover should also be IT(TP)A No.712/Bang/2020 Page

M/S TATA POWER SOLAR SYSTEMS LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 709/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri, Kanchan Koushal, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.N. Suresh Babu, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(10)

method adopted by the assessee and accordingly made an adjustment of Rs.3,29,82,771. The AO passed the draft assessment order including the TP adjustment. The AO while IT(TP)A No.709/Bang/2017 Page 3 of 14 passing the draft assessment order made addition towards difference in the revenue between Form 26AS and the profit and loss account

TOYOTA BOSHOKU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BIDADI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OR THE DCIT, CIRCLE - 7(1)(1), KORAMANGALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1539/BANG/2024[AY 2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 May 2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri K.R Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)
Section 234ASection 270A

disallowance of royalty payments is unjustified and accordingly pleaded to dismiss the TPO’s findings and uphold the assessee's position in the light of the judicial precedents cited. . IT(TP)A No.1539/Bang/2024 Page 8 of 37 13. On the other hand, the learned DR before us submitted that there was no need to make any payment of royalty

CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 390/BANG/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, CIT-2(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 92C

disallowance proposed by the AO and rejected the Appellant’s objections. 24.2 The ld. AR submitted a note on the method of provision for warranty as follows:- IT(TP

M/S. INGERSOLL - RAND TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2499/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 2499/Bang/2019 Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/S. Ingersoll-Rand Technologies & Services Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant 8Th Floor, Tower D, Commissioner Of Ibc Knowledge Park, Income Tax, No. 4/1, Bannerghatta Circle 3(1)(1), Main Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 029. Pan: Aaaci2961B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ankur Pai, Advocate : Smt. S. Praveena, Cit Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 04-11-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 04-01-2023 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 11/10/2019 Passed By The Ld.Acit, Circle-3 (1)(1), Bangalore Relating To Assessment Year 2015-16 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Order Is Bad In Law & On Facts 1.1 The Order Passed By Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle - 3(1)(1) ["Learned Ao"] Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ["The Act"] Is Bad In Law & On Facts & Therefore, Liable To Be Set Aside.

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 43BSection 92C

methods are revenue neutral. 8.4 The learned AO and Hon'ble DRP ought to have considered the submission filed and the explanations provided by the Appellant. 9. Disallowance of dealers' commission 9.1 The learned AO and Hon'ble have erred in disallowing the provision for dealers' commission amounting to INR 40,82,286 for the reason that the same

M/S. ABB GLOBAL INDUSTRIES AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS ABB GLOBAL INDUSTRIES AND SERVICES LIMITED),BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed as indicated hereinabove

ITA 3/BANG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy Sit(Tp)A No. 03/Bang/2020 Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/S. Abb Global Industries & Services Pvt. Ltd. (Earlier Known As Abb The Deputy Global Industries & Commissioner Of Services Ltd.) Income Tax, 21St Floor, Wtc, Circle – 1(1)(1), Dr. Rajkumar Road, Bangalore. Vs. Malleshwaram, Bangalore – 560 055. Pan: Aadca3217B Appellant Respondent : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee By Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Neera Malhotra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 01-03-2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 17-03-2023 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 30.10.2019 Passed By The Ld.Dcit, Circle – 1(1)(1), Bangalore For A.Y. 2015-16 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Grounds Stated Here Under Are Independent Of & Without Prejudice To One Another: 1. Assessment Bad In Law At The Outset, Abb Global Industries & Services Private Limited (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Appellant' Or 'The Company') Prays That The Order Dated 30Th October 2019

For Respondent: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar
Section 143(3)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

method in the TP study report. The TPO also erred on facts and in Page 4 of 15 IT(TP)A No. 3/Bang/2020 ABB Global Industries and Services Pvt. Ltd. law treating outstanding receivables as a separate international transaction as per provisions of section 92B of the Act. 2.6 Treatment of provision no longer required as non- operating income

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LARGE TAX PAYERS UNIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 593/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Sridhar E, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 115Section 115JSection 237Section 80J

disallowance made by the AO by observing as under: “5.5.1 The assessee contended before the AO that the expenditure got crystallized only during the current year and therefore the expenditure is allowable in the current year. The same arguments are repeated before the appellate forum also. The contentions of the assessee are carefully considered. The AO clearly brought on record

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2, LTU, BENGALURU vs. M/S. ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 446/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Sridhar E, CIT (DR)For Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 115Section 115JSection 237Section 80J

disallowance made by the AO by observing as under: “5.5.1 The assessee contended before the AO that the expenditure got crystallized only during the current year and therefore the expenditure is allowable in the current year. The same arguments are repeated before the appellate forum also. The contentions of the assessee are carefully considered. The AO clearly brought on record

QUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE :LIMITED,BELAGAVI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, BELAGAVI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 279/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuit(Tp)A No.279/Bang/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, D.R
Section 92C

disallowance made by the AO u/s 14A of the Act. The assessing officer passed the final assessment order IT(TP)A No.279/Bang/2022 M/s. QuEST Global Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Belagavi Page 13 of 38 on 24.2.2022. Aggrieved from the above order, the assessee filed appeal before this Tribunal. Ground No.4 6. The ld. A.R. in ground no.4 submitted that

M/S PALMER INVESTMENT GROUP LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 2929/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. Manasa Ananthan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malthora, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92A(2)Section 92C

disallowance Amount (in Rs.) 1 Re-computation of arm's length price of shares sold 2,62,27,80,021 by the assessee 2 Differential tax on account of difference in rate of tax 96,52,74,468 on capital gains (based on the assessed income) M/s. Palmer Investment Group Ltd. 4. Consequent to the final assessment order total income

M/S UB SPORTS MANAGEMENT OVERSEAS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 2930/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. Manasa Ananthan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malthora, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92A(2)Section 92C

disallowance Amount (in Rs.) 1 Re-computation of arm's length price of shares sold 2,62,27,80,021 by the assessee 2 Differential tax on account of difference in rate of tax 96,52,74,468 on capital gains (based on the assessed income) M/s. Palmer Investment Group Ltd. 4. Consequent to the final assessment order total income

HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 924/BANG/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Nov 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, D.R
Section 28

disallowed the provision so created. In substance, assessee had not claimed deduction of excise duty payment. Subsequently, vide order, dated 08.02.2023, the JCIT has passed an order holding that the assessee had subsequently written-off a sum of Rs.1,20,16,395/- out of the aforementioned amount during the financial year relevant to AN. 2007-08 and claimed the same