Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80D(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9 Chandigarh9 Jaipur8 Hyderabad6 Kolkata6 Bangalore4 Delhi4 Visakhapatnam2 Chennai2 Nagpur2 Ahmedabad2 Panaji1 Indore1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)5 Section 1545 Section 80C4 Section 14A4 Section 904 Section 143(1)(a)3 Section 139(1)3 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3

M/S MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,UDUPI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, UDUPI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 325/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14A

b) The learned CIT(A)-l0, Bengaluru has overlooked the following decisions relied on by the Appellant. i) CIT Vs. Karnataka State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (65 Taxmann.com 295) (Kar) ii) CCI Limited vs. JCIT [250 ITR 291] (Kar) iii) DCIT Vs. Subramanya Constructions & Development Corporation Ltd. (ITA No.404/2013), dated 20.2.2013 (ITAT Bangalore). iv) Manipal Prakashan Private Limited

M/S MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,UDUPI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, UDUPI

M/S MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,UDUPI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, UDUPI

BACHIRA UTHAIAH POOVAIAH,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(4), BENGALURU

ARIBA TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU

SRI. SANJAY RAMPRAKASH SAXENA,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , BENGALURU