SRI. PATIL KADPAKAL GARJAN,,SHIMOGA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMOGA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

disallowances therefore penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') is initiated separately. The assessee 4 challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT (Appeals) and submitted that the assessee agreed to the addition on estimation of income at 12.5% with the condition that the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE vs. OHIO UNIVERSITY CHRIST COLLEGE ACADEMY FOR MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeals for both Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10 are dismissed