BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 29Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi64Mumbai14Ahmedabad3Jaipur2Rajkot2Bangalore2Chennai2Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 40A(2)(a)3Section 402Addition to Income2

KIDS CLINIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ADDL.C.I.T., BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 784/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year :2011-12 M/S.Kids Clinic India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1533, 9Th Main, Range - 5,Bengaluru. 3Rd Block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru – 560 071. Pan : Aacck 7678 R Assesseee By : Shri. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate : Revenue By Shri. Tshering Ongda, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bangalore Date Of Hearing : 19.1.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.1.2021 O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)(a)

29C) defining maximum marginal rate and section 113 dealing with tax on undisclosed income of block period which provide for tax to be increased by applicable surcharge. Thus, these provisions of the Act also support surcharge as being part of income tax. Further, education cess is defined as additional surcharge in sections 2(11) and 2(12) of the Finance

SHRI. PANKAJ RANKA,BANGALORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE

In the result, the asssessee’s appeals is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 35/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ak Garodia & Shri Pankaj Ranka, No.157, 15Th Cross, Cubbonpet Main Raod, Bengaluru. . Appellant Pan No. – Adzpr8650H. Vs. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(3) (3), Bangalore. Respondent Appellant By : Shri Bharath L, C.A Respondent By : Shri Palani Kumar, Acit Date Of Hearing : 22-11-2017 Date Of Pronouncement : -11-2017 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Bharath L, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, ACIT
Section 194ASection 197ASection 40

disallowing a sum of Rs. 2,52,146/- being interest paid ITA No.35/B/17 2 to Shristi Corporation for non-deduction of tax at source under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. c) The LAA erred in confirming the action of the LAO in not considering that the Appellant had not deducted tax at source on the interest payment