BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore19Hyderabad13Delhi10Agra8Chennai8Kolkata7Jaipur6Mumbai6Cochin5Pune4Ahmedabad4Visakhapatnam3Bangalore3Nagpur2Raipur2SC2Chandigarh2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D5Section 153C4Section 69C4Section 269S3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 234A2Section 1322Unexplained Investment2

MAHESHWARAPPA MUNIRAMU,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 2(2), BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 757/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2017-18 Maheshwarappa Muniramu #4261/17, 2Nd Cross, 20Th Main Subramanya Nagar Jcit Vs. Bengaluru 560 021 Range 2(2) Bangalore Pan No :Aempm8290C Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Sri Nagaraj K. H., Ca Respondent By : Sri Subramaniam, Jcit Dr Date Of Hearing : 30.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.09.2025

For Appellant: Sri Nagaraj K. H., CAFor Respondent: Sri Subramaniam, JCIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 244ASection 250Section 269SSection 271DSection 274

disallowances. The ld. CIT(A)/NFAC had also observed in his Order that the assessee received substantial portion of sale consideration in cheques & DDs. We are of the considered opinion that there is no dispute by the either side with regard to the receipt of cash in the impugned transaction on sale of immovable property by the Maheshwarappa Muniramu, Bangalore

M/S. RAMYA RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1937/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: None but written submissionFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 132Section 153CSection 234ASection 269SSection 271DSection 69C

disallowances made by the LAO without considering that the same is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act to the extent they are prejudicial to the Appellant since the order is against the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') and the judicial precedence on the subject. 3. On the addition

M/S. RAMYA RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1938/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: None but written submissionFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 132Section 153CSection 234ASection 269SSection 271DSection 69C

disallowances made by the LAO without considering that the same is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act to the extent they are prejudicial to the Appellant since the order is against the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') and the judicial precedence on the subject. 3. On the addition