BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur15Delhi12Chennai10Mumbai7Jaipur6Hyderabad5Bangalore4Kolkata4Lucknow2Jodhpur2Karnataka1Pune1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 1547Section 143(1)6Section 405Section 143(3)4Section 143(1)(a)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Rectification u/s 1543

MARVELL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1608/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Rahul Chaudharym/S. Marvell India Private Limited 10Th Floor, Tower D & E Global Technology Park, Marathahalli Outer Ring Road Devarabeesanahalli Village Varthurhobli Bangalore 560 103 ………. Appellant [Pan: Aaecm5559R]

For Appellant: Sri Chavali NarayanFor Respondent: Sri Muthu Shankar
Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 200ASection 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 270ASection 274
Section 2502
Section 282
Depreciation2
Section 28

200A of the Act. 5. Other grounds 5.1. The learned AO has erred, in law and on facts, by computing interest liability of INR 6,79,322 under Section 234A, INR.92,01,062 under section 234B and INR 9,20,335 under section 234C of the Act. 6. Penalty Proceedings 6.1. The learned AO has erred

M/S. PRAZIM TRADING AND INVESTMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1039/BANG/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2021-22 M/S. Prazim Trading & Investment Vs. Dcit, Company Private Limited, Circle – 3(1)(1), 574, Next To Wipro Corporate Office, Bengaluru. Sarjapur Road, Doddakkanelli, Bengaluru – 560 035. Pan : Aaacp 4921 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. B. K. Manjunath, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 02.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.06.2024

For Appellant: Shri. B. K. Manjunath, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250

disallowances. The difference of Rs.4,93,34,784/- is on account of (i) unrealized loss on mutual fund added back in Sl. No.23 of schedule BP of Rs.12,61,348/- (ii) notional interest income on Page 3 of 9 employee’s receivables reduced in Sl. No. 33 of schedule BP of Rs.1,54,35,936/- (iii) Rs.6

M/S. KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(5) PRESENTLY CIRCLE 4(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 282/BANG/2017[2002 - 2003]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Jan 2021

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Kannan Narayanan, JCIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263

200A.] [(1A) Where any matte has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal or revision relating to an order referred to in sub-section (1), the authority passing such order may, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other

S.B. PATIL,SHIMOGA vs. CIT, DAVANGERE

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 987/BANG/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jun 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri. B. S. K. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Farhat Hussain Qureshi, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 44A

disallowance under various heads will cover- up any deficiency or lapse if any that may arise in this case". Further, in the instant case of my client Deptt. got the legitimate tax on Income assessed at 10.08 of total work receipts (After adding back Chapter VI-A deduction). This assessed income is far above the rate of 8 required