Search: disallowance

29 results for “disallowance”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14884 Section 14755 Section 148A31 Deduction14 Reopening of Assessment14 Section 25012 Section 5412 Section 153A12 Disallowance12 Addition to Income

VIVIDHODHESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMINA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NI GEJJALAGERE ,MANDYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, , MANDYA

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2071/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Kothari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Dept

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 254Section 80P

disallowances of deduction claimed u/s 80P of Rs. 8,84,405/- is upheld and ground No 1 to 4 raised are dismissed. 11. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT(A) the assessee is in appeal before the tribunal. . Page 6 of 12 12. The learned AR before me submitted that the assessment framed under section 147/144B

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

VIVIDHODHESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMINA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NI GEJJALAGERE ,MANDYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, , MANDYA

VIVIDHODHESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMINA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NI GEJJALAGERE ,MANDYA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, , MANDYA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. NUTRICRAFT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BENGALURU

REHANA PARVEEN,MANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(3)(1), BANGALORE

M/S. EUROFINS PEENYA RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOW AS EUROFINS ADVINUS LIMITED),BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

EUROFINS PEENYA RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EUROFINS ADVINUS LIMITED) ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1) , BANGALORE

HEDDUR VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMITHA ,SHIMOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS , SHIMOGA

VAZHOOR SUDARSANAN THAMPI,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), WARD-2(1), BENGALURU

GOPAL ANIL KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

DAVANAM JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

RANGSONS SCHUSTER TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MANDYA vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1)& TPS , MYSORE

SHILPA NARA,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARY

SHILPA NARA,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARY

VARUN MANJUNATHA ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BANGALORE

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,MANGALORE, MANGALORE vs. RAJ DIAMONDS, MUMBAI

KOGOD BASAVARAJU JAYACHANDRA ,HASSAN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

SMT. NISHITA NANDISH ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

PUVVADA VEERA KUMAR,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

HANCHIPURA CHANNAIAH NANDAKISHORE,MAHALKSHMIPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD INTL, TAXATION 1(2) BANGALORE, BANGALORE