Search: depreciation

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 8Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5 Bangalore4 Hyderabad3 Jaipur3 Chennai3 Delhi2 Kolkata1 Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 10A27 Deduction4 Addition to Income4 Section 80I3 Section 115J3 Section 143(1)3 Section 143(3)3 TDS3 Disallowance3

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S KHIVRAJ MOTORS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 894/BANG/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Jun 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. K. Garodia & Shri. Lalit Kumari.T.A Nos.894/Bang/2016 (Assessment Year : 2012-13) Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -1(2)(1), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. M/S. Khivraj Motors, No.10/2, 4Th Floor, Kasturba Road, Bengaluru 560 001 .. Respondent Pan : Aaafk6627K Assessee By : Shri. H. N. Khincha, Ca Revenue By : Shri. M. K. Biju, Jcit Heard On : 01.06.2017 Pronounced On : 02.06.2017 O R D E R Per Lalit Kumar:

For Appellant: Shri. H. N. Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri. M. K. Biju, JCIT

Section 143(2)Section 80Section 801Section 801ASection 80I

depreciation and loss suffered in the eligible business, again the same cannot be set off against the profits derived from the eligible business if and when a claim for deduction is made. 9. The Madras High Court in the aforesaid Velayudhaswamy's case interpreting the very provision held, from. a reading of sub-section (1) Section 8o

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S KHIVRAJ MOTORS, BANGALORE

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S KHIVRAJ MOTORS, BANGALORE

M/S MCML SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BANGALORE

M/S MCML SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BANGALORE

M/S MCML SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BANGALORE