BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai17Ranchi13Jaipur11Chennai10Hyderabad10Bangalore9Kolkata5Ahmedabad4Delhi4Pune1Cochin1SC1

Key Topics

Section 32(1)(ii)20Section 3716Section 35E11Deduction9Depreciation8Disallowance7Carry Forward of Losses7Section 35(1)(ii)6Addition to Income6TDS

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , BELLARY vs. M/S. SOUTH WEST MINING LIMITED, BELLARY

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and CO filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 457/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2011-12 Ito M/S. South West Mining Limited Aayakar Bhavan Staff Road Vidya Nagar Fort Bellary Near Talur Cross Karnataka Toranagallu Vs. Bellary 583 201 Karnataka Pan No : Aafcs9792M Appellant Respondent C.O. No.4/Bang/2023 (Arising Out Of Ita No.457/Bang/2023) Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. South West Mining Limited Ito Vs. Bellary 583 201 Ward-1 Karnataka Bellary Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.R. Revenue By : Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 20.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.02.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: This Appeal By Revenue & Co By Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of Nfac For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Dated 21.4.2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). The Revenue In This Appeal Raised Following Ground: “Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Is Justified On The Facts Of The Case & In Law, In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.287.72 Crores Claimed Towards “Mine Development Expenditure” U/S 37(1) In The Computation Of Income Which Was Not Routed Through The Profit & Loss Account.”

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 234B
6
Section 143(1)3
Section 143(3)2
Section 250
Section 37
Section 37(1)

Section, the Central Board Direct Taxes had this to say: “48. New s. 35E, also inserted by s. 8 of the Amending Act, provides for the amortisation of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively on any operations relating to prospecting for the specified minerals or groups of associated minerals or on the development of a mine or other natural deposit

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2138/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in Rubber Pipe nature 3 Construction of Hume 1,73,939 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2139/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in Rubber Pipe nature 3 Construction of Hume 1,73,939 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2136/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in Rubber Pipe nature 3 Construction of Hume 1,73,939 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2135/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in Rubber Pipe nature 3 Construction of Hume 1,73,939 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2137/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in Rubber Pipe nature 3 Construction of Hume 1,73,939 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S INDO GOLD MINES PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as dismissed for statistical purposes

ITA 92/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Jul 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kannan Narayanan, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 35E

depreciation and other expenses. The assessee claimed entire expenses as its business loss in both the years under consideration and accordingly sought carry forward of losses. Since the assessee did not generate any revenue and the A.O. took the view that the assessee has not started any activity. The Indian Share holder of the assessee company, viz., M/s Metal mining

INDO GOLD MINES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as dismissed for statistical purposes

ITA 1837/BANG/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kannan Narayanan, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 35E

depreciation and other expenses. The assessee claimed entire expenses as its business loss in both the years under consideration and accordingly sought carry forward of losses. Since the assessee did not generate any revenue and the A.O. took the view that the assessee has not started any activity. The Indian Share holder of the assessee company, viz., M/s Metal mining

SRI. SENAPATHY GOPALAKRISHNAN,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3(1)(4), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1414/BANG/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Premi, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT) Bengaluru
Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(ii)Section 80G

Depreciation debited into P&L 0 Less: Deductible expenses to be excluded (5,25,00,000) (35 to 35E, 32AD, 33AB, 33ABA) Less: Income considered separately (1,38,359) Adjusted profit from business (4,52,77,277) Total income from business or profession (4,52,77,277) Capital Gains 50,94,610 Income from other sources