109 results for “depreciation”+ Section 355clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 109 · Page 1 of 6
Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeassessment Year : 2005-06 M/S. Ing Vysya Bank Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ing Vysya House, Income Tax, No.22, M.G. Road, Circle 11(4), Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Pan: Aabct 0529M Appellant Respondent Assessment Year : 2005-06 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Ing Vysya Bank Ltd., Income Tax, Bangalore – 560 001. Circle 11(4), Pan: Aabct 0529M Bangalore. Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri S. Ananthan, C.A. Revenue By : Shri C.H. Sundar Rao, Cit-I(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 20.01.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2015 O R D E R Per N.V. Vasudevan
section 145 of the Act. Therefore, the total depreciation in respect of the investment amounting to Rs.16,99,68,583/- was claimed and that the AO was not correct in adding back the appreciation. The Assessee relied on various decisions in their submissions including the decision of the Hon’ble ITAT, Bangalore in the case of Corporation Bank, Mangalore (ITA.No