BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,039 results for “depreciation”+ Section 31clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,812Delhi2,456Bangalore1,039Chennai844Kolkata561Ahmedabad455Hyderabad249Jaipur236Raipur149Pune145Chandigarh135Karnataka95Surat89Indore88Amritsar87Visakhapatnam63Cuttack58Lucknow54Rajkot50Cochin49SC45Ranchi42Guwahati26Jodhpur25Nagpur25Telangana24Dehradun21Kerala19Allahabad17Panaji14Agra11Patna5Calcutta4Jabalpur3Rajasthan2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1Tripura1Varanasi1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)91Addition to Income74Disallowance52Section 14847Depreciation39Deduction36Section 4030Section 153A29Section 133A27Transfer Pricing

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 292/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

31. In view of the above facts and legal position, the learned AR submitted that the invocation of the sixth proviso to section 32(1) of the Act is wholly incorrect, both on facts and in law. There is no succession of business under section 170 of the Act, there is no aggregate claim of depreciation

Showing 1–20 of 1,039 · Page 1 of 52

...
26
Section 14724
Section 115J24

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 293/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

31. In view of the above facts and legal position, the learned AR submitted that the invocation of the sixth proviso to section 32(1) of the Act is wholly incorrect, both on facts and in law. There is no succession of business under section 170 of the Act, there is no aggregate claim of depreciation

EDGEVERVE SYSTEMS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 290/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 250Section 254Section 37Section 90

31. In view of the above facts and legal position, the learned AR submitted that the invocation of the sixth proviso to section 32(1) of the Act is wholly incorrect, both on facts and in law. There is no succession of business under section 170 of the Act, there is no aggregate claim of depreciation

M/S VOLVO INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1537/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153(1)Section 18

31. As per section 2(42C) of the Act, Slump Sale means, the transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of the sale for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to the individual assets and liabilities in such sales. There is no dispute that the transfer of RDB by IRIL to the Assessee under

BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 510/BANG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raobangalore International Airport Ltd. Administration Block, Bial, Devanahalli Bangalore-560 300. … Appellant Pan:Aabc8973D Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(2), Bangalore. … Respondent & Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(2), Bangalore. … Appellant Vs. Bangalore International Airport Ltd. Bangalore-560 300. … Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sampath Raghunathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

depreciation [Sections 32 and 43(1)], and also as regards capital assets for scientific research [section 35(1)(iv )] and also regarding patent rights or copyrights [Section 35A]. 31

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 662/BANG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Sept 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raobangalore International Airport Ltd. Administration Block, Bial, Devanahalli Bangalore-560 300. … Appellant Pan:Aabc8973D Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(2), Bangalore. … Respondent & Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 11(2), Bangalore. … Appellant Vs. Bangalore International Airport Ltd. Bangalore-560 300. … Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sampath Raghunathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 43B

depreciation [Sections 32 and 43(1)], and also as regards capital assets for scientific research [section 35(1)(iv )] and also regarding patent rights or copyrights [Section 35A]. 31

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 144/BANG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 185/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 186/BANG/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 1349/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(5), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 143/BANG/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(5), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 142/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 1267/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPENT CORPORATION LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13 and 2014-15 are treated as partly allowed

ITA 187/BANG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Nov 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

depreciation is allowed therein under Explanation to sec.32 of the Act. Accordingly, he submitted that the Ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowances made by the AO. 6.2 We heard the parties and perused the record. The principles relating to “current repairs” has been explained by Hon’ble Supreme ITA Nos.1267 & 1349/Bang/2019

M/S. SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE- 6, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 147/BANG/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Sri Padamchand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Sumer Singh Meena, DR
Section 10ASection 10BSection 14ASection 250Section 32(1)(iia)Section 80

section 10AA deduction. Reliance in this regard is placed on: CIT v Socidade De Fomento Industrial Pvt Limited (No.1) i. (2020) 429 ITR 207 (Born) [CLC-III Pg.466-486] M/s. Syngene International Limited, Bangalore Page 13 of 29 CIT v Enable Exports (P.) Ltd. (2012) 17 taxmann.com ii. 182 (Del) [CLC-III Pg.487-489] ' 3.9 Turnover criterion: The turnover of EOU unit

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2135/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Hence, assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on such asset at the specified rate.” 8.26 In our opinion, the Mining Lease being right to undertake mining activity and the acquisition of surface rights thereon falls with the purview of the term “business or commercial right” ITA Nos.2135 to 2139/Bang/2018 M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2138/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Hence, assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on such asset at the specified rate.” 8.26 In our opinion, the Mining Lease being right to undertake mining activity and the acquisition of surface rights thereon falls with the purview of the term “business or commercial right” ITA Nos.2135 to 2139/Bang/2018 M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2136/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Hence, assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on such asset at the specified rate.” 8.26 In our opinion, the Mining Lease being right to undertake mining activity and the acquisition of surface rights thereon falls with the purview of the term “business or commercial right” ITA Nos.2135 to 2139/Bang/2018 M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2137/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Hence, assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on such asset at the specified rate.” 8.26 In our opinion, the Mining Lease being right to undertake mining activity and the acquisition of surface rights thereon falls with the purview of the term “business or commercial right” ITA Nos.2135 to 2139/Bang/2018 M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2139/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &
Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Hence, assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on such asset at the specified rate.” 8.26 In our opinion, the Mining Lease being right to undertake mining activity and the acquisition of surface rights thereon falls with the purview of the term “business or commercial right” ITA Nos.2135 to 2139/Bang/2018 M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal