Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai15 Chennai15 Ahmedabad7 Delhi7 Jaipur7 Pune5 Visakhapatnam3 Bangalore3 Patna2 Kolkata2 Raipur2 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 44A9 Section 271A9 Section 2634 Section 271B3 Deduction3 Depreciation3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Revision u/s 2633 Section 143(3)

K R MAHESHA,MADDUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-3, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 365/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessmentyear:2016-17

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, D.R

Section 263Section 271ASection 271BSection 44A

section 44AD(2) of the Act. The Ld. Principal CIT also noticed that the A.O. has dropped the penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271A of the Act accepting the decision cited by the assessee, viz., decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court rendered in the case of CIT Vs. Babu Reddy (2010) 38 DTR 147 (KAR). The Ld PCIT took

K R MAHESHA,MADDUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-3, BANGALORE

K R MAHESHA,MADDUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-3, BANGALORE

SIDDAPPA B T,MANDYA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-3, BANGALORE

R GOVINDE GOWDA,MANDYA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-3, BANGALORE