BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “depreciation”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28Chennai24Delhi18Bangalore15Amritsar13Chandigarh11Indore7Nagpur6Pune5Panaji4Raipur4Jaipur4Kolkata2SC1Dehradun1Patna1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 14333Disallowance14Section 15412Deduction12Depreciation11Section 143(3)8Section 10B5Section 153A5Section 2634Section 115

DINESH KUMAR SINGHI,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 is partly allowed

ITA 699/BANG/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Apr 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep, C.AFor Respondent: Shri K.V. Arvind, Standing Counsel for Dept
Section 10BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 154

section 132(4) of the Act. No specific request for cross examination was made by the assessee. xvi. The quarterly and annual performance report submitted to SEZ the assessee declared that the unit has commenced production from the EOU only since 30/5/2006. From the about is clear that EOU was not established till 30/5/2006 and not entitled for deduction under

4
Section 115Q4
Natural Justice2

HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 162/BANG/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jun 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri T.Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs Neera Malhotra, CIT-II
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 250Section 263

246A of the Act", without appreciating that the CIT's directions under section 263 to the AO in the instant case, was not conclusive but was merely a direction to further examine the issues on merit and facts. 3. Computation` of relief u/s 10A f the Act 3.1 The ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on fats

ADDL/JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LTU) , BANGALORE vs. M/S TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT LTD , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 525/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: FixedITAT Bangalore11 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 115Section 115QSection 143(3)Section 246A

246A provides for appellate remedy for different types of tax demands raised upon the assessee and there should not be any dispute that the assessees have been filing separate appeals for the demand raised under different sections of the Act. 4.12 In the case of Genpact India P Ltd, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court noticed that the additional

M/S TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 275/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: FixedITAT Bangalore11 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 115Section 115QSection 143(3)Section 246A

246A provides for appellate remedy for different types of tax demands raised upon the assessee and there should not be any dispute that the assessees have been filing separate appeals for the demand raised under different sections of the Act. 4.12 In the case of Genpact India P Ltd, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court noticed that the additional

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 249/BANG/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 250/BANG/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 251/BANG/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 243/BANG/2018[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 1999-00

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 253/BANG/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 254/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , UDUPI , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 255/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 252/BANG/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 245/BANG/2018[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 247/BANG/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased

M/S MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED ,MANIPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , , UDUPI

240 & 241/Bang/2018

ITA 248/BANG/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kumar Rao, C. AFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143Section 154

section stands satisfied notwithstanding non usage of the assets itself by the assessee. Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the judgment rendered in the case of Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Supra) noted that the assets in ITA Nos. 239 to 255/Bang/2018 Page 27 of 37 question are owned by the assessee and the assessee had leased